Edit Info Other
Login

Diff for "FoundingPrinciples"

Differences between revisions 6 and 15 (spanning 9 versions)
Revision 6 as of 2007-03-02 16:34:17
Size: 2453
Editor: MatthiasSaou
Comment:
Revision 15 as of 2012-07-03 13:30:32
Size: 1418
Comment: Manually remove SPAM
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from FoundingPrincipals
= rpmf
usion founding principles =
= RPM Fusion founding principles =
Line 4: Line 3:
Before we start working on technical details, I think its very important to have a set of founding principles, much like the "Core Principles" of fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives This page contains the set of founding principles, much like the "[[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundations]]" of Fedora.
Line 6: Line 5:
I've split the principles into 2 sets for now, one we all agree on, and one for principles which are still under discussion. == Principles we agree on ==
Line 8: Line 7:
== Principles we all agree on == The RPM Fusion's repositories and the infrastructure to maintain them follow Fedora where possible. This means using [[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines|Fedora's packaging guidelines]] (except for legal), Fedora's review process for new submissions, Fedora's VCS structure etc.
Line 10: Line 9:
 * The new repo will follow Fedora where possible. This means using
 Fedora's packaging guidelines (except for legal), Fedora's review
 process for new submissions, Fedora's VCS structure, Fedora's build system
 etc.
We have two main repositories:
Line 15: Line 11:
 * The main new repo will contain add-on packages and not replacements in
 relation to the base package set. Whereby the base package set is defined
 as: RHEL/centos + EPEL (1) or Fedora (Fedora 7+) or Fedora Core + Fedora Extras (Fedora 6-)
  * one named "free" for Open Source Software (as defined by the [[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing|Fedora Licensing Guidelines]]) which can't be included in Fedora because it might be patent encumbered in the US
 
  * one named "nonfree" for non-free software, that is everything else which can't be in free; this includes software with public available source-code that has "no commercial use"-like restrictions
Line 19: Line 15:
 As an exception, with proper motivation replacements are allowed, but the replacements and any
 packages requiring the replacements will be in a seperate repo which will NOT be enabled by
 default.
The nonfree repository depends on the free repository; Open Source Software which depends on non-free software is shipped in the nonfree repository.
Line 23: Line 17:
 * rpmfusion will contain kernel module packages in the main repo Both repositories contain only add-on packages and not replacements in relation to the base package set. Whereby the base package set is defined as: RHEL/CentOS + EPEL or Fedora (Fedora 7+)
Line 25: Line 19:
== Principles under discussion ==

 * kernel packages maybe packaged using
 the kmod (fedora) dkms (freshrpms) or kmdls(atrpms) kernel module packaging schemes (2). A module may
 be made available for more then one scheme. But the "Name: " tag of the
 packages must be unique, if this currently is the not the case then the maintainers of the
 conflicting packages will work this out together. Also different packages of the same module
 must explicitly Conflict each other.

== Footnotes ==

(1) While EPEL is not available, we will assume an empty EPEL repo. As EPEL gets populated
we will work together with EPEL to avoid conflicts/overlaps. This also means that where dependencies for certain packages are missing we will provide these by rebuilding (and adapting where nescesarry) those bits from Fedora.

(2) This means that plague must be modified to support al these,
or even that we may use a different buildsystem altogether if thats
easier, as long as the buildsystem uses mock with the fedora minimal
buildroot.

Notice that this doesn't mention how we are actually going todo anything yet, nor with which base distro releases we will start. This is intentional as these (important) details are not part of our founding principles.
RPM Fusion accepts kernel module packages in [[http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2|Kmod2 standard]].

RPM Fusion founding principles

This page contains the set of founding principles, much like the "http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundations" of Fedora.

Principles we agree on

The RPM Fusion's repositories and the infrastructure to maintain them follow Fedora where possible. This means using Fedora's packaging guidelines (except for legal), Fedora's review process for new submissions, Fedora's VCS structure etc.

We have two main repositories:

  • one named "free" for Open Source Software (as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines) which can't be included in Fedora because it might be patent encumbered in the US

  • one named "nonfree" for non-free software, that is everything else which can't be in free; this includes software with public available source-code that has "no commercial use"-like restrictions

The nonfree repository depends on the free repository; Open Source Software which depends on non-free software is shipped in the nonfree repository.

Both repositories contain only add-on packages and not replacements in relation to the base package set. Whereby the base package set is defined as: RHEL/CentOS + EPEL or Fedora (Fedora 7+)

RPM Fusion accepts kernel module packages in Kmod2 standard.

FoundingPrinciples (last edited 2023-11-14 09:37:58 by anonymous)